Gran antipasto italiano vs Bresaola
Overall, Bresaola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gran antipasto italiano | Bresaola |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 299 kcal | 158 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 4.6 g | 3.9 g |
| Protein | 28 g | 35 g |
| Additives | 3 | 2 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Pork | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bresaola has 47% fewer calories (158 kcal vs 299 kcal).
- Bresaola has 92% less fat (1.6 g vs 21 g).
- Bresaola has 94% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 8.1 g).
- Gran antipasto italiano has no sugar, while Bresaola has 0.5 g.
- Bresaola has 15% less salt (3.9 g vs 4.6 g).
- Bresaola has 20% more protein (35 g vs 28 g).
- Only Gran antipasto italiano lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Pork.
Ingredients
Gran antipasto italiano
jambon cru, coppa, saucisson, Viande de porc, sel, dextrose, épices et plantes aromatiques, antioxydants: ascorbate de sodium; conservateurs: nitrate de potassium, nitrite de sodium; arômes.
Bresaola
Viande bovine, sel, dextrose, arômes naturels, conservateurs: nitrite de sodium, nitrate de potassium.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gran antipasto italiano or Bresaola?
Overall, Bresaola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bresaola has fewer calories: 158 kcal versus 299 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gran antipasto italiano has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.