Prisca bio abóbora vs Abóbora
Overall, Prisca bio abóbora has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Prisca bio abóbora | Abóbora |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 204 kcal | 222 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 30.7 g | 46 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Prisca bio abóbora has 33% less sugar (30.7 g vs 46 g).
Ingredients
Prisca bio abóbora
Abóbora" 70%, sumo concentrado, de fruta", pectina", laranja" e canela".("ingredientes biológicos).
Abóbora
Abóbora 51,4%, sumo concentrado de fruta, pectina, casca de laranja e canela.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Prisca bio abóbora or Abóbora?
Overall, Prisca bio abóbora has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Prisca bio abóbora has fewer calories: 204 kcal versus 222 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Prisca bio abóbora has less sugar: 30.7 g versus 46 g per 100 g.