Prisca bio abóbora vs Doce de abobora
Overall, Prisca bio abóbora has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Prisca bio abóbora | Doce de abobora |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 204 kcal | 244 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 30.7 g | 59 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Prisca bio abóbora has 16% fewer calories (204 kcal vs 244 kcal).
- Prisca bio abóbora has 48% less sugar (30.7 g vs 59 g).
- Doce de abobora has 63% more protein (0.6 g vs 0.2 g).
- Prisca bio abóbora has the better Nutri-Score.
- Doce de abobora is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Prisca bio abóbora
Abóbora" 70%, sumo concentrado, de fruta", pectina", laranja" e canela".("ingredientes biológicos).
Doce de abobora
Abóbora, açúcar, açúcar de cana, concentrado de limão e pectina de citrinos. Preparado com 50g de fruta por 100g de produto.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Prisca bio abóbora or Doce de abobora?
Overall, Prisca bio abóbora has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Prisca bio abóbora has fewer calories: 204 kcal versus 244 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Prisca bio abóbora has less sugar: 30.7 g versus 59 g per 100 g.