Comparison

Abóbora vs Prisca bio abóbora

Overall, Prisca bio abóbora has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAbóboraPrisca bio abóbora
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 233 kcal 204 kcal
Fat 0.2 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 54.5 g 30.7 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1.8 g —
Protein 0.7 g 0.2 g
Additives11
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Prisca bio abóbora has 12% fewer calories (204 kcal vs 233 kcal).
  • Prisca bio abóbora has 44% less sugar (30.7 g vs 54.5 g).
  • Abóbora has 69% more protein (0.7 g vs 0.2 g).
  • Prisca bio abóbora has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Abóbora

Abóbora (51%), Sumo de Frutos Concentrado (48,1%), Gelificante (Pectina), Laranja (0,2%) e Canela (0,2%).

Prisca bio abóbora

Abóbora" 70%, sumo concentrado, de fruta", pectina", laranja" e canela".("ingredientes biológicos).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Abóbora or Prisca bio abóbora?

Overall, Prisca bio abóbora has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Prisca bio abóbora has fewer calories: 204 kcal versus 233 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Prisca bio abóbora has less sugar: 30.7 g versus 54.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons