Prisca bio abóbora vs Cabello De Ángel.
Overall, Prisca bio abóbora has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Prisca bio abóbora | Cabello De Ángel. |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 204 kcal | 239 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 30.7 g | 48.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 0.2 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Prisca bio abóbora has 15% fewer calories (204 kcal vs 239 kcal).
- Prisca bio abóbora has 37% less sugar (30.7 g vs 48.5 g).
- Cabello De Ángel. has 69% more protein (0.7 g vs 0.2 g).
- Prisca bio abóbora has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Prisca bio abóbora
Abóbora" 70%, sumo concentrado, de fruta", pectina", laranja" e canela".("ingredientes biológicos).
Cabello De Ángel.
Pulpa de calabaza (62g para elaborar 100g de producto), azúcar, almidón modificado, espesantes: carragenato y garrofín, limón y acidulante: ácido cítrico.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Prisca bio abóbora or Cabello De Ángel.?
Overall, Prisca bio abóbora has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Prisca bio abóbora has fewer calories: 204 kcal versus 239 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Prisca bio abóbora has less sugar: 30.7 g versus 48.5 g per 100 g.