Power Carb Heat 1:0.8 vs Triple Magnesium
Overall, Triple Magnesium has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Power Carb Heat 1:0.8 | Triple Magnesium |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 385 kcal | 320 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 50.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Triple Magnesium has 17% fewer calories (320 kcal vs 385 kcal).
- Triple Magnesium has no sugar, while Power Carb Heat 1:0.8 has 50.1 g.
- Triple Magnesium has no salt, while Power Carb Heat 1:0.8 has 1.2 g.
- Triple Magnesium has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Power Carb Heat 1:0.8
ZUTATEN/INGREDIENTS: [DE] Maltodextrin (EU), Fructose, 10,2% Kokosnusswasserpulver, Natriumcitrat, Calciumcitrat, Salz, Kaliumcitrat, Magnesiumcitrat. [EN] Maltodextrin (EU), fructose, 10.2% coconut water powder, sodium citrate, calcium citrate, salt, potassium citrate, magnesium citrate. HINWEISE / NOTES: [DE]
Triple Magnesium
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Power Carb Heat 1:0.8 or Triple Magnesium?
Overall, Triple Magnesium has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Triple Magnesium has fewer calories: 320 kcal versus 385 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Triple Magnesium has less sugar: 0 g versus 50.1 g per 100 g.