Comparison
Triple Magnesium vs Energy sport bar
Overall, Triple Magnesium has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Triple Magnesium | Energy sport bar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 320 kcal | 383 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 5.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 31 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Triple Magnesium has 16% fewer calories (320 kcal vs 383 kcal).
- Triple Magnesium has no fat, while Energy sport bar has 5.2 g.
- Triple Magnesium has no saturated fat, while Energy sport bar has 0.7 g.
- Triple Magnesium has no sugar, while Energy sport bar has 31 g.
- Energy sport bar has 100% more protein (5 g vs 0 g).
- Triple Magnesium has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Triple Magnesium
Not available.
Energy sport bar
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Triple Magnesium or Energy sport bar?
Overall, Triple Magnesium has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Triple Magnesium has fewer calories: 320 kcal versus 383 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Triple Magnesium has less sugar: 0 g versus 31 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Isoton Energiedrink Saue... vs Energy sport bar
Triple Magnesium vs Isoton Energiedrink Saue...
Power Carb Heat 1:0.8 vs Energy sport bar
Power Carb Heat 1:0.8 vs Triple Magnesium
Power Carb 1:08 Sour Che... vs Energy sport bar
Power Carb 1:08 Sour Che... vs Triple Magnesium
Endurance Fuel Berry vs Energy sport bar
Triple Magnesium vs Endurance Fuel Berry