Isoton Energiedrink Sauerkirsche vs Energy sport bar
Overall, Energy sport bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Isoton Energiedrink Sauerkirsche
Energy sport bar
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Isoton Energiedrink Sauerkir... | Energy sport bar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 365 kcal | 383 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 5.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 35 g | 31 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Isoton Energiedrink Sauerkirsche has no fat, while Energy sport bar has 5.2 g.
- Isoton Energiedrink Sauerkirsche has no saturated fat, while Energy sport bar has 0.7 g.
- Energy sport bar has 11% less sugar (31 g vs 35 g).
- Energy sport bar has 86% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.6 g).
- Energy sport bar has 100% more protein (5 g vs 0 g).
- Energy sport bar has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Isoton Energiedrink Sauerkirsche
Maltodextrin, Saccharose, Säuerungsmittel: Zitronensäure, Calciumlactat Natriumchlorid, Trimagnesiumcitrat, Kaliumcitrat, Aroma.
Energy sport bar
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Isoton Energiedrink Sauerkirsche or Energy sport bar?
Overall, Energy sport bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Isoton Energiedrink Sauerkirsche has fewer calories: 365 kcal versus 383 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Energy sport bar has less sugar: 31 g versus 35 g per 100 g.