Triple Magnesium vs Isoton Energiedrink Sauerkirsche
Overall, Triple Magnesium has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Triple Magnesium
Isoton Energiedrink Sauerkirsche
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Triple Magnesium | Isoton Energiedrink Sauerkir... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 320 kcal | 365 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 35 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Triple Magnesium has 12% fewer calories (320 kcal vs 365 kcal).
- Triple Magnesium has no sugar, while Isoton Energiedrink Sauerkirsche has 35 g.
- Triple Magnesium has no salt, while Isoton Energiedrink Sauerkirsche has 1.6 g.
- Triple Magnesium has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Triple Magnesium
Not available.
Isoton Energiedrink Sauerkirsche
Maltodextrin, Saccharose, Säuerungsmittel: Zitronensäure, Calciumlactat Natriumchlorid, Trimagnesiumcitrat, Kaliumcitrat, Aroma.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Triple Magnesium or Isoton Energiedrink Sauerkirsche?
Overall, Triple Magnesium has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Triple Magnesium has fewer calories: 320 kcal versus 365 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Triple Magnesium has less sugar: 0 g versus 35 g per 100 g.