Triple Magnesium vs Endurance Fuel Berry
Overall, Triple Magnesium has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Triple Magnesium | Endurance Fuel Berry |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 320 kcal | 370 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 0 g | 92.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 2.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Triple Magnesium has 14% fewer calories (320 kcal vs 370 kcal).
- Triple Magnesium has no sugar, while Endurance Fuel Berry has 92.6 g.
- Triple Magnesium has no salt, while Endurance Fuel Berry has 2.9 g.
- Triple Magnesium has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Triple Magnesium
Not available.
Endurance Fuel Berry
Dextrose (Glucose), Cane Sugar, Citric Acid, Sodium Citrate, Sea Salt, Potassium Chloride, Organic Berry Flavor, Calcium Carbonate, Magnesium Oxide
FAQ
Which is healthier: Triple Magnesium or Endurance Fuel Berry?
Overall, Triple Magnesium has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Triple Magnesium has fewer calories: 320 kcal versus 370 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Triple Magnesium has less sugar: 0 g versus 92.6 g per 100 g.