Power Carb Heat 1:0.8 vs Endurance Fuel Berry
Overall, Power Carb Heat 1:0.8 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Power Carb Heat 1:0.8 | Endurance Fuel Berry |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 385 kcal | 370 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | — |
| Sugars | 50.1 g | 92.6 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 2.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | — |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Power Carb Heat 1:0.8 has 46% less sugar (50.1 g vs 92.6 g).
- Power Carb Heat 1:0.8 has 59% less salt (1.2 g vs 2.9 g).
Ingredients
Power Carb Heat 1:0.8
ZUTATEN/INGREDIENTS: [DE] Maltodextrin (EU), Fructose, 10,2% Kokosnusswasserpulver, Natriumcitrat, Calciumcitrat, Salz, Kaliumcitrat, Magnesiumcitrat. [EN] Maltodextrin (EU), fructose, 10.2% coconut water powder, sodium citrate, calcium citrate, salt, potassium citrate, magnesium citrate. HINWEISE / NOTES: [DE]
Endurance Fuel Berry
Dextrose (Glucose), Cane Sugar, Citric Acid, Sodium Citrate, Sea Salt, Potassium Chloride, Organic Berry Flavor, Calcium Carbonate, Magnesium Oxide
FAQ
Which is healthier: Power Carb Heat 1:0.8 or Endurance Fuel Berry?
Overall, Power Carb Heat 1:0.8 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Endurance Fuel Berry has fewer calories: 370 kcal versus 385 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Power Carb Heat 1:0.8 has less sugar: 50.1 g versus 92.6 g per 100 g.