Comparison

Power Carb Heat 1:0.8 vs Isoton Energiedrink Sauerkirsche

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPower Carb Heat 1:0.8Isoton Energiedrink Sauerkir...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 385 kcal 365 kcal
Fat 0.1 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 50.1 g 35 g
Salt 1.2 g 1.6 g
Fiber 0.1 g 0 g
Protein 0.1 g 0 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Isoton Energiedrink Sauerkirsche has 30% less sugar (35 g vs 50.1 g).
  • Power Carb Heat 1:0.8 has 26% less salt (1.2 g vs 1.6 g).

Ingredients

Power Carb Heat 1:0.8

ZUTATEN/INGREDIENTS: [DE] Maltodextrin (EU), Fructose, 10,2% Kokosnusswasserpulver, Natriumcitrat, Calciumcitrat, Salz, Kaliumcitrat, Magnesiumcitrat. [EN] Maltodextrin (EU), fructose, 10.2% coconut water powder, sodium citrate, calcium citrate, salt, potassium citrate, magnesium citrate. HINWEISE / NOTES: [DE]

Isoton Energiedrink Sauerkirsche

Maltodextrin, Saccharose, Säuerungsmittel: Zitronensäure, Calciumlactat Natriumchlorid, Trimagnesiumcitrat, Kaliumcitrat, Aroma.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Power Carb Heat 1:0.8 or Isoton Energiedrink Sauerkirsche?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Isoton Energiedrink Sauerkirsche has fewer calories: 365 kcal versus 385 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Isoton Energiedrink Sauerkirsche has less sugar: 35 g versus 50.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons