Comparison

Power Carb Heat 1:0.8 vs Energy sport bar

Overall, Energy sport bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPower Carb Heat 1:0.8Energy sport bar
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 385 kcal 383 kcal
Fat 0.1 g 5.2 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.7 g
Sugars 50.1 g 31 g
Salt 1.2 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0.1 g —
Protein 0.1 g 5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Power Carb Heat 1:0.8 has 98% less fat (0.1 g vs 5.2 g).
  • Power Carb Heat 1:0.8 has 86% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Energy sport bar has 38% less sugar (31 g vs 50.1 g).
  • Energy sport bar has 81% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Energy sport bar has 98% more protein (5 g vs 0.1 g).
  • Energy sport bar has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Power Carb Heat 1:0.8

ZUTATEN/INGREDIENTS: [DE] Maltodextrin (EU), Fructose, 10,2% Kokosnusswasserpulver, Natriumcitrat, Calciumcitrat, Salz, Kaliumcitrat, Magnesiumcitrat. [EN] Maltodextrin (EU), fructose, 10.2% coconut water powder, sodium citrate, calcium citrate, salt, potassium citrate, magnesium citrate. HINWEISE / NOTES: [DE]

Energy sport bar

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Power Carb Heat 1:0.8 or Energy sport bar?

Overall, Energy sport bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Energy sport bar has fewer calories: 383 kcal versus 385 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Energy sport bar has less sugar: 31 g versus 50.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons