Comparison

Pork Tenderloin vs Rückensteaks vom Duroc-Schwein in Canadian-Style-Marinade

Overall, Pork Tenderloin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPork TenderloinRückensteaks vom Duroc-Schwe...
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 119 kcal 180 kcal
Fat 3 g 10 g
Saturated fat 1 g 4.2 g
Sugars 0.1 g 0.9 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.5 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 21 g 21 g
Additives00
AllergensLupin, MustardNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pork Tenderloin has 34% fewer calories (119 kcal vs 180 kcal).
  • Pork Tenderloin has 70% less fat (3 g vs 10 g).
  • Pork Tenderloin has 76% less saturated fat (1 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Pork Tenderloin has 89% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Pork Tenderloin has 80% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Pork Tenderloin has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Pork Tenderloin lists: Lupin, Mustard.

Ingredients

Pork Tenderloin

Muşchiulet de porc, sare, amestec de condimente. Poate conţine urme de lapte şi produse derivate, muştar, seminţe de susan, fructe cu coajă lemnoasă, lupin, ouă şi ţelină.

Rückensteaks vom Duroc-Schwein in Canadian-Style-Marinade

Schweinefleisch 94%, Marinade (Rapsöl, Sonnenblumenöl, Zucker, Speisesalz, Salfett, Ahornsirup, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Gewürze, Kräuter, Stärke, Maltodextrin, Speisewürze, Gewürzextrakt, Aroma).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pork Tenderloin or Rückensteaks vom Duroc-Schwein in Canadian-Style-Marinade?

Overall, Pork Tenderloin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pork Tenderloin has fewer calories: 119 kcal versus 180 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pork Tenderloin has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons