Comparison
Pork loin vs Longe de porc
Overall, Longe de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pork loin | Longe de porc |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 213 kcal | 187 kcal |
| Fat | 12.4 g | 5.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.2 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 3.8 g |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | — |
| Protein | 24.7 g | 34 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Longe de porc has 12% fewer calories (187 kcal vs 213 kcal).
- Longe de porc has 54% less fat (5.7 g vs 12.4 g).
- Longe de porc has 62% less saturated fat (2 g vs 5.2 g).
- Longe de porc has no sugar, while Pork loin has 0.5 g.
- Pork loin has 86% less salt (0.5 g vs 3.8 g).
- Longe de porc has 27% more protein (34 g vs 24.7 g).
- Pork loin has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pork loin
Not available.
Longe de porc
viande de porc, sel, dextrose, épices, arômes, conservateurs: nitrite de sodium, nitrate de potassium.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pork loin or Longe de porc?
Overall, Longe de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Longe de porc has fewer calories: 187 kcal versus 213 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Longe de porc has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Muschi file feliat vs Longe de porc
Pork loin vs Schab Wędzony na wiśniow...
Tranches de filet à la T... vs Longe de porc
Muschi file feliat vs Pork loin
Schab Wędzony na wiśniow... vs Longe de porc
Tranches de filet à la T... vs Pork loin
Thick Cut Pork Lion Stea... vs Longe de porc
Thick Cut Pork Lion Stea... vs Pork loin