Tranches de filet à la Texane vs Pork loin
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tranches de filet à la Texan... | Pork loin |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 139 kcal | 213 kcal |
| Fat | 5.6 g | 12.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 5.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 24.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tranches de filet à la Texane has 35% fewer calories (139 kcal vs 213 kcal).
- Tranches de filet à la Texane has 55% less fat (5.6 g vs 12.4 g).
- Tranches de filet à la Texane has 63% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 5.2 g).
- Pork loin has 58% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.2 g).
- Pork loin has 46% less salt (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Pork loin has 15% more protein (24.7 g vs 21 g).
Ingredients
Tranches de filet à la Texane
Carré de porc traité en salaison 92% (carré de porc issu d'animaux élevés sans antibiotique dès la fin du sevrage 87%, eau, sel, arôme naturel*), eau, huile de tournesol, sucre, poudre d'oignon, amidon de maïs, épices, poudre de vinaigre d'alcool, sucre caramélisé, sel, poudre de tomate, extrait de levure, poudre de jus de citron, arômes naturels, arôme de fumée, poudre d'ail, extraits d'épices. *contient naturellement de l'acide ascorbique, de l'acide acétique et des polyphénols.
Pork loin
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tranches de filet à la Texane or Pork loin?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tranches de filet à la Texane has fewer calories: 139 kcal versus 213 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pork loin has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.