Comparison
Polenta vs Polenta Valsugana
Overall, Polenta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Polenta | Polenta Valsugana |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 353 kcal | 355 kcal |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 1.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 6.9 g | 7.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Polenta Valsugana has 33% less fat (1.2 g vs 1.8 g).
- Polenta has 83% less sugar (0.7 g vs 4 g).
- Polenta has 100% more fiber (2.5 g vs 0 g).
- Polenta has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Polenta
Semoule de maïs, Traces de gluten,
Polenta Valsugana
Farina di mais
FAQ
Which is healthier: Polenta or Polenta Valsugana?
Overall, Polenta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Polenta has fewer calories: 353 kcal versus 355 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Polenta has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 4 g per 100 g.