Pois wasabi vs Roasted chickpeas sea salt
Overall, Roasted chickpeas sea salt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pois wasabi | Roasted chickpeas sea salt |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 405 kcal | 388 kcal |
| Fat | 8.1 g | 10.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 3 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 11 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 14 g | 15 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 20.4 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Mustard, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pois wasabi has 24% less fat (8.1 g vs 10.7 g).
- Roasted chickpeas sea salt has 60% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 3 g).
- Roasted chickpeas sea salt has 85% less sugar (1.7 g vs 11 g).
- Roasted chickpeas sea salt has 32% less salt (1.5 g vs 2.2 g).
- Roasted chickpeas sea salt has 26% more protein (20.4 g vs 15 g).
- Roasted chickpeas sea salt has the better Nutri-Score.
- Roasted chickpeas sea salt is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Pois wasabi lists: Mustard, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Pois wasabi
Petits pois 75%, farine de riz gluant, amidon de maïs, sucre, sel, huile de soja, wasabi 0,5% (moutarde), colorants : curcumine, bleu brillant FCF,
Roasted chickpeas sea salt
Chickpeas (88%), Rapeseed Oil, Sea Salt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pois wasabi or Roasted chickpeas sea salt?
Overall, Roasted chickpeas sea salt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Roasted chickpeas sea salt has fewer calories: 388 kcal versus 405 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Roasted chickpeas sea salt has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 11 g per 100 g.