Comparison

Roasted chickpeas sea salt vs Leev bio YES PEAS! paprika 90g

Overall, Roasted chickpeas sea salt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRoasted chickpeas sea saltLeev bio YES PEAS! paprika 9...
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 388 kcal 336 kcal
Fat 10.7 g 6.9 g
Saturated fat 1.2 g 1.2 g
Sugars 1.7 g 3.8 g
Salt 1.5 g 2.2 g
Fiber 15 g 29.4 g
Protein 20.4 g 22.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Leev bio YES PEAS! paprika 90g has 13% fewer calories (336 kcal vs 388 kcal).
  • Leev bio YES PEAS! paprika 90g has 36% less fat (6.9 g vs 10.7 g).
  • Roasted chickpeas sea salt has 55% less sugar (1.7 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Roasted chickpeas sea salt has 32% less salt (1.5 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Leev bio YES PEAS! paprika 90g has 49% more fiber (29.4 g vs 15 g).
  • Roasted chickpeas sea salt has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Roasted chickpeas sea salt is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Roasted chickpeas sea salt

Chickpeas (88%), Rapeseed Oil, Sea Salt

Leev bio YES PEAS! paprika 90g

94% biologische kikkererwten*, 4% paprikakruiden (ui, paprika, tomaat, pastinaak*, knoflook*, keukenzout, kruidenextracten), zonnebloemolie*, glansmiddel: arabische gom zout. van gecontroleerd biologische teelt. Kan sporen van mosterdzaad bevatten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Roasted chickpeas sea salt or Leev bio YES PEAS! paprika 90g?

Overall, Roasted chickpeas sea salt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Leev bio YES PEAS! paprika 90g has fewer calories: 336 kcal versus 388 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Roasted chickpeas sea salt has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons