Pipas Pelades vs Pipas #ke by kelia
Overall, Pipas Pelades has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pipas Pelades | Pipas #ke by kelia |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 631 kcal | 642 kcal |
| Fat | 55 g | 54.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.7 g | 5.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.1 g | 3.4 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | 12 g | — |
| Protein | 25 g | 27.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipas #ke by kelia has 34% less saturated fat (5.1 g vs 7.7 g).
- Pipas Pelades has 38% less sugar (2.1 g vs 3.4 g).
- Pipas Pelades has 45% less salt (1.2 g vs 2.2 g).
- Pipas #ke by kelia has 10% more protein (27.9 g vs 25 g).
- Pipas Pelades has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pipas Pelades
Pipes de gira-sol, oli vegetal de gira-sol alt oleic, sal (1,2 %).
Pipas #ke by kelia
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pipas Pelades or Pipas #ke by kelia?
Overall, Pipas Pelades has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pipas Pelades has fewer calories: 631 kcal versus 642 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipas Pelades has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.