Comparison

Pipas Pelades vs Pipas #ke by kelia

Overall, Pipas Pelades has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPipas PeladesPipas #ke by kelia
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 631 kcal 642 kcal
Fat 55 g 54.8 g
Saturated fat 7.7 g 5.1 g
Sugars 2.1 g 3.4 g
Salt 1.2 g 2.2 g
Fiber 12 g —
Protein 25 g 27.9 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pipas #ke by kelia has 34% less saturated fat (5.1 g vs 7.7 g).
  • Pipas Pelades has 38% less sugar (2.1 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Pipas Pelades has 45% less salt (1.2 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Pipas #ke by kelia has 10% more protein (27.9 g vs 25 g).
  • Pipas Pelades has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Pipas Pelades

Pipes de gira-sol, oli vegetal de gira-sol alt oleic, sal (1,2 %).

Pipas #ke by kelia

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pipas Pelades or Pipas #ke by kelia?

Overall, Pipas Pelades has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pipas Pelades has fewer calories: 631 kcal versus 642 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pipas Pelades has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons