Comparison

Pipas Pelades vs Kaskaras gigantonas

Overall, Kaskaras gigantonas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPipas PeladesKaskaras gigantonas
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 631 kcal 600 kcal
Fat 55 g 48 g
Saturated fat 7.7 g 5.8 g
Sugars 2.1 g 2.2 g
Salt 1.2 g 0.2 g
Fiber 12 g —
Protein 25 g 33 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kaskaras gigantonas has 13% less fat (48 g vs 55 g).
  • Kaskaras gigantonas has 25% less saturated fat (5.8 g vs 7.7 g).
  • Kaskaras gigantonas has 81% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Kaskaras gigantonas has 24% more protein (33 g vs 25 g).

Ingredients

Pipas Pelades

Pipes de gira-sol, oli vegetal de gira-sol alt oleic, sal (1,2 %).

Kaskaras gigantonas

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pipas Pelades or Kaskaras gigantonas?

Overall, Kaskaras gigantonas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kaskaras gigantonas has fewer calories: 600 kcal versus 631 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pipas Pelades has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons