Pipas Pelades vs Kaskaras gigantonas
Overall, Kaskaras gigantonas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pipas Pelades | Kaskaras gigantonas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 631 kcal | 600 kcal |
| Fat | 55 g | 48 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.7 g | 5.8 g |
| Sugars | 2.1 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 12 g | — |
| Protein | 25 g | 33 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kaskaras gigantonas has 13% less fat (48 g vs 55 g).
- Kaskaras gigantonas has 25% less saturated fat (5.8 g vs 7.7 g).
- Kaskaras gigantonas has 81% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.2 g).
- Kaskaras gigantonas has 24% more protein (33 g vs 25 g).
Ingredients
Pipas Pelades
Pipes de gira-sol, oli vegetal de gira-sol alt oleic, sal (1,2 %).
Kaskaras gigantonas
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pipas Pelades or Kaskaras gigantonas?
Overall, Kaskaras gigantonas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kaskaras gigantonas has fewer calories: 600 kcal versus 631 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipas Pelades has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.