Pipas #ke by kelia vs Kaskaras gigantonas
Overall, Kaskaras gigantonas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pipas #ke by kelia | Kaskaras gigantonas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 642 kcal | 600 kcal |
| Fat | 54.8 g | 48 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.1 g | 5.8 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 27.9 g | 33 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kaskaras gigantonas has 12% less fat (48 g vs 54.8 g).
- Pipas #ke by kelia has 12% less saturated fat (5.1 g vs 5.8 g).
- Kaskaras gigantonas has 36% less sugar (2.2 g vs 3.4 g).
- Kaskaras gigantonas has 90% less salt (0.2 g vs 2.2 g).
- Kaskaras gigantonas has 15% more protein (33 g vs 27.9 g).
- Kaskaras gigantonas has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pipas #ke by kelia
Not available.
Kaskaras gigantonas
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pipas #ke by kelia or Kaskaras gigantonas?
Overall, Kaskaras gigantonas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kaskaras gigantonas has fewer calories: 600 kcal versus 642 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kaskaras gigantonas has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.