Pipa tostada gigante agua-sal vs Pipas #ke by kelia
Overall, Pipas #ke by kelia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pipa tostada gigante agua-sa... | Pipas #ke by kelia |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 640 kcal | 642 kcal |
| Fat | 56 g | 54.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.6 g | 5.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.7 g | 3.4 g |
| Salt | 3 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | 12 g | — |
| Protein | 24 g | 27.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipas #ke by kelia has 23% less saturated fat (5.1 g vs 6.6 g).
- Pipa tostada gigante agua-sal has 21% less sugar (2.7 g vs 3.4 g).
- Pipas #ke by kelia has 27% less salt (2.2 g vs 3 g).
- Pipas #ke by kelia has 14% more protein (27.9 g vs 24 g).
Ingredients
Pipa tostada gigante agua-sal
Not available.
Pipas #ke by kelia
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pipa tostada gigante agua-sal or Pipas #ke by kelia?
Overall, Pipas #ke by kelia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pipa tostada gigante agua-sal has fewer calories: 640 kcal versus 642 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipa tostada gigante agua-sal has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.