Comparison

Pipa tostada gigante agua-sal vs Pipas Pelades

Overall, Pipas Pelades has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Pipa tostada gigante agua-sa...	Pipas Pelades
Nutri-Score	e	d
NOVA group	—	3
Calories	640 kcal	631 kcal
Fat	56 g	55 g
Saturated fat	6.6 g	7.7 g
Sugars	2.7 g	2.1 g
Salt	3 g	1.2 g
Fiber	12 g	12 g
Protein	24 g	25 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Pipa tostada gigante agua-sal has 14% less saturated fat (6.6 g vs 7.7 g).
Pipas Pelades has 22% less sugar (2.1 g vs 2.7 g).
Pipas Pelades has 60% less salt (1.2 g vs 3 g).
Pipas Pelades has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Pipa tostada gigante agua-sal

Not available.

Pipas Pelades

Pipes de gira-sol, oli vegetal de gira-sol alt oleic, sal (1,2 %).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pipa tostada gigante agua-sal or Pipas Pelades?

Overall, Pipas Pelades has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pipas Pelades has fewer calories: 631 kcal versus 640 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pipas Pelades has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Pipas grandes supremas vs Pipas Pelades Pipa tostada gigante agu... vs Pipas tostadas con sal Pipa tostada gigante agu... vs Kaskaras gigantonas Pipa tostada gigante agu... vs Pipas grefusa sabor whop... Pipa tostada gigante agu... vs Pipas #ke by kelia Pipa tostada gigante agu... vs Pipas Oro El Manisero Pipas Pelades vs Pipas #ke by kelia Pipas tostadas con sal vs Pipas Pelades