Pipas grandes supremas vs Pipas Pelades
Overall, Pipas grandes supremas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pipas grandes supremas | Pipas Pelades |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 272 kcal | 631 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 55 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.9 g | 7.7 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 2.1 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 4 g | 12 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipas grandes supremas has 57% fewer calories (272 kcal vs 631 kcal).
- Pipas grandes supremas has 60% less fat (22 g vs 55 g).
- Pipas grandes supremas has 62% less saturated fat (2.9 g vs 7.7 g).
- Pipas grandes supremas has 19% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.1 g).
- Pipas Pelades has 40% less salt (1.2 g vs 2 g).
- Pipas Pelades has 67% more fiber (12 g vs 4 g).
- Pipas Pelades has 44% more protein (25 g vs 14 g).
- Pipas grandes supremas has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pipas grandes supremas
Not available.
Pipas Pelades
Pipes de gira-sol, oli vegetal de gira-sol alt oleic, sal (1,2 %).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pipas grandes supremas or Pipas Pelades?
Overall, Pipas grandes supremas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pipas grandes supremas has fewer calories: 272 kcal versus 631 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipas grandes supremas has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.