Pipas vs El piponazo
Overall, El piponazo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pipas | El piponazo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 520 kcal | 252 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.4 g | 2.8 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 10 g |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 3.8 g |
| Protein | 24.6 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- El piponazo has 52% fewer calories (252 kcal vs 520 kcal).
- El piponazo has 28% less fat (21 g vs 29 g).
- El piponazo has 17% less saturated fat (2.8 g vs 3.4 g).
- El piponazo has 33% less sugar (1.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Pipas has 99% less salt (0.1 g vs 10 g).
- El piponazo has 29% more fiber (3.8 g vs 2.7 g).
- Pipas has 43% more protein (24.6 g vs 14 g).
- Pipas has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pipas lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Pipas
Sunflower seeds, wheat flour, salt
El piponazo
Semillas de girasol, sal, harina de arroz, fécula de patata.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pipas or El piponazo?
Overall, El piponazo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
El piponazo has fewer calories: 252 kcal versus 520 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
El piponazo has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.