Comparison
Pinienkerne vs Pinienkerne
Overall, Pinienkerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pinienkerne | Pinienkerne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 596 kcal | 596 kcal |
| Fat | 51 g | 50.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.1 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 7.2 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pinienkerne has 79% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 6.1 g).
- Pinienkerne has 89% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
- Pinienkerne has 100% more fiber (7.2 g vs 0 g).
- Pinienkerne has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pinienkerne
Not available.
Pinienkerne
Pinienkerne
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pinienkerne or Pinienkerne?
Overall, Pinienkerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pinienkerne has fewer calories: 596 kcal versus 596 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pinienkerne has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.