Comparison
Pinienkerne vs Pignons de pin
Overall, Pinienkerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pinienkerne | Pignons de pin |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 596 kcal | 653 kcal |
| Fat | 50.8 g | 61 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 9.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 7.2 g | 11 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pinienkerne has 17% less fat (50.8 g vs 61 g).
- Pinienkerne has 86% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 9.4 g).
- Pignons de pin has no sugar, while Pinienkerne has 0.9 g.
- Pignons de pin has 35% more fiber (11 g vs 7.2 g).
- Pinienkerne has 50% more protein (24 g vs 12 g).
Ingredients
Pinienkerne
Pinienkerne
Pignons de pin
100 % pignons de pin. Peut contenir des traces d'arachides, de soja, de fruits à coque et de sésame.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pinienkerne or Pignons de pin?
Overall, Pinienkerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pinienkerne has fewer calories: 596 kcal versus 653 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pignons de pin has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.