Comparison
Pinienkerne vs Pignons de pin
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pinienkerne | Pignons de pin |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 596 kcal | 653 kcal |
| Fat | 51 g | 61 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.1 g | 9.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 11 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pinienkerne has 16% less fat (51 g vs 61 g).
- Pinienkerne has 35% less saturated fat (6.1 g vs 9.4 g).
- Pignons de pin has 100% more fiber (11 g vs 0 g).
- Pinienkerne has 50% more protein (24 g vs 12 g).
- Pignons de pin has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pinienkerne
Not available.
Pignons de pin
100 % pignons de pin. Peut contenir des traces d'arachides, de soja, de fruits à coque et de sésame.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pinienkerne or Pignons de pin?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pinienkerne has fewer calories: 596 kcal versus 653 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pignons de pin has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.