Comparison
Pinienkerne vs Pinienkerne
Overall, Pinienkerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pinienkerne | Pinienkerne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 698 kcal | 596 kcal |
| Fat | 64 g | 51 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.5 g | 6.1 g |
| Sugars | 4.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 7.2 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pinienkerne has 15% fewer calories (596 kcal vs 698 kcal).
- Pinienkerne has 20% less fat (51 g vs 64 g).
- Pinienkerne has 98% less sugar (0.1 g vs 4.4 g).
- Pinienkerne has 100% more fiber (7.2 g vs 0 g).
- Pinienkerne has 25% more protein (24 g vs 18 g).
- Pinienkerne has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pinienkerne
Pinienkerne.
Pinienkerne
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pinienkerne or Pinienkerne?
Overall, Pinienkerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pinienkerne has fewer calories: 596 kcal versus 698 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pinienkerne has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 4.4 g per 100 g.