Piña en rodajas 100% natural vs Oeufs de Saumon
Overall, Piña en rodajas 100% natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Piña en rodajas 100% natural | Oeufs de Saumon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 67 kcal | 238 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 2.8 g |
| Sugars | 9.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 27 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 29 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Piña en rodajas 100% natural has 72% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 238 kcal).
- Piña en rodajas 100% natural has no fat, while Oeufs de Saumon has 12 g.
- Piña en rodajas 100% natural has no saturated fat, while Oeufs de Saumon has 2.8 g.
- Oeufs de Saumon has no sugar, while Piña en rodajas 100% natural has 9.2 g.
- Piña en rodajas 100% natural has no salt, while Oeufs de Saumon has 27 g.
- Oeufs de Saumon has 98% more protein (29 g vs 0.5 g).
- Piña en rodajas 100% natural has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Oeufs de Saumon lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Piña en rodajas 100% natural
Not available.
Oeufs de Saumon
Oeufs de _saumon_ keta du pacifique (oncorhynchus keta) 97% - sel. traces de mollusques, crustacés, lait, céréales contenant du gluten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Piña en rodajas 100% natural or Oeufs de Saumon?
Overall, Piña en rodajas 100% natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Piña en rodajas 100% natural has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 238 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Oeufs de Saumon has less sugar: 0 g versus 9.2 g per 100 g.