Piña en rodajas 100% natural vs Oeufs de lompe d’islande
Overall, Piña en rodajas 100% natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Piña en rodajas 100% natural | Oeufs de lompe d’islande |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 67 kcal | 66 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 3.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 9.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 8.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Piña en rodajas 100% natural has no fat, while Oeufs de lompe d’islande has 3.1 g.
- Piña en rodajas 100% natural has no saturated fat, while Oeufs de lompe d’islande has 0.7 g.
- Oeufs de lompe d’islande has no sugar, while Piña en rodajas 100% natural has 9.2 g.
- Piña en rodajas 100% natural has no salt, while Oeufs de lompe d’islande has 5 g.
- Oeufs de lompe d’islande has 94% more protein (8.7 g vs 0.5 g).
- Piña en rodajas 100% natural has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Piña en rodajas 100% natural
Not available.
Oeufs de lompe d’islande
Œufs de lompe 82%, eau, sel, épaississant E415, acidifiant E330, arôme, conservateur E211, extraits d’épices, colorants : E151, E150d
FAQ
Which is healthier: Piña en rodajas 100% natural or Oeufs de lompe d’islande?
Overall, Piña en rodajas 100% natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Oeufs de lompe d’islande has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 67 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Oeufs de lompe d’islande has less sugar: 0 g versus 9.2 g per 100 g.