Comparison

Piña en rodajas 100% natural vs Oeufs de saumon sauvage

Overall, Piña en rodajas 100% natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPiña en rodajas 100% naturalOeufs de saumon sauvage
Nutri-Score b e
NOVA group — —
Calories 67 kcal 242 kcal
Fat 0 g 12.4 g
Saturated fat 0 g 2.9 g
Sugars 9.2 g 0.2 g
Salt 0 g 3 g
Protein 0.5 g 31.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Piña en rodajas 100% natural has 72% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 242 kcal).
  • Piña en rodajas 100% natural has no fat, while Oeufs de saumon sauvage has 12.4 g.
  • Piña en rodajas 100% natural has no saturated fat, while Oeufs de saumon sauvage has 2.9 g.
  • Oeufs de saumon sauvage has 98% less sugar (0.2 g vs 9.2 g).
  • Piña en rodajas 100% natural has no salt, while Oeufs de saumon sauvage has 3 g.
  • Oeufs de saumon sauvage has 98% more protein (31.3 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Piña en rodajas 100% natural has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Piña en rodajas 100% natural

Not available.

Oeufs de saumon sauvage

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Piña en rodajas 100% natural or Oeufs de saumon sauvage?

Overall, Piña en rodajas 100% natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Piña en rodajas 100% natural has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 242 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Oeufs de saumon sauvage has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 9.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons