Piña en rodajas 100% natural vs Oeufs de saumon sauvage
Overall, Piña en rodajas 100% natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Piña en rodajas 100% natural | Oeufs de saumon sauvage |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 67 kcal | 242 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 12.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 2.9 g |
| Sugars | 9.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 31.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Piña en rodajas 100% natural has 72% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 242 kcal).
- Piña en rodajas 100% natural has no fat, while Oeufs de saumon sauvage has 12.4 g.
- Piña en rodajas 100% natural has no saturated fat, while Oeufs de saumon sauvage has 2.9 g.
- Oeufs de saumon sauvage has 98% less sugar (0.2 g vs 9.2 g).
- Piña en rodajas 100% natural has no salt, while Oeufs de saumon sauvage has 3 g.
- Oeufs de saumon sauvage has 98% more protein (31.3 g vs 0.5 g).
- Piña en rodajas 100% natural has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Piña en rodajas 100% natural
Not available.
Oeufs de saumon sauvage
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Piña en rodajas 100% natural or Oeufs de saumon sauvage?
Overall, Piña en rodajas 100% natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Piña en rodajas 100% natural has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 242 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Oeufs de saumon sauvage has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 9.2 g per 100 g.