Piña en rodajas 100% natural vs Oeuf de lompe
Overall, Piña en rodajas 100% natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Piña en rodajas 100% natural | Oeuf de lompe |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | e |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 67 kcal | 83 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 3.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 9.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 6.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 10.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Piña en rodajas 100% natural has 19% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 83 kcal).
- Piña en rodajas 100% natural has no fat, while Oeuf de lompe has 3.9 g.
- Piña en rodajas 100% natural has no saturated fat, while Oeuf de lompe has 0.9 g.
- Oeuf de lompe has 90% less sugar (0.9 g vs 9.2 g).
- Piña en rodajas 100% natural has no salt, while Oeuf de lompe has 6.3 g.
- Oeuf de lompe has 95% more protein (10.9 g vs 0.5 g).
- Piña en rodajas 100% natural has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Piña en rodajas 100% natural
Not available.
Oeuf de lompe
oeuf de lompe
FAQ
Which is healthier: Piña en rodajas 100% natural or Oeuf de lompe?
Overall, Piña en rodajas 100% natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Piña en rodajas 100% natural has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 83 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Oeuf de lompe has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 9.2 g per 100 g.