Comparison

Piña en rodajas 100% natural vs Oeuf de lompe

Overall, Piña en rodajas 100% natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPiña en rodajas 100% naturalOeuf de lompe
Nutri-Score b e
NOVA group — 1
Calories 67 kcal 83 kcal
Fat 0 g 3.9 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.9 g
Sugars 9.2 g 0.9 g
Salt 0 g 6.3 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 0.5 g 10.9 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Piña en rodajas 100% natural has 19% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 83 kcal).
  • Piña en rodajas 100% natural has no fat, while Oeuf de lompe has 3.9 g.
  • Piña en rodajas 100% natural has no saturated fat, while Oeuf de lompe has 0.9 g.
  • Oeuf de lompe has 90% less sugar (0.9 g vs 9.2 g).
  • Piña en rodajas 100% natural has no salt, while Oeuf de lompe has 6.3 g.
  • Oeuf de lompe has 95% more protein (10.9 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Piña en rodajas 100% natural has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Piña en rodajas 100% natural

Not available.

Oeuf de lompe

oeuf de lompe

FAQ

Which is healthier: Piña en rodajas 100% natural or Oeuf de lompe?

Overall, Piña en rodajas 100% natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Piña en rodajas 100% natural has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 83 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Oeuf de lompe has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 9.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons