Pilos vs Kakao kohupiimapasta
Overall, Pilos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pilos | Kakao kohupiimapasta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 96 kcal | 130 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 5.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 3.3 g |
| Sugars | 2.9 g | 12 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 18.8 g | 8.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pilos has 26% fewer calories (96 kcal vs 130 kcal).
- Pilos has 94% less fat (0.3 g vs 5.2 g).
- Pilos has 94% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 3.3 g).
- Pilos has 76% less sugar (2.9 g vs 12 g).
- Pilos has 53% more protein (18.8 g vs 8.8 g).
- Pilos has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Kakao kohupiimapasta lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Pilos
Odtučnené pasterizované mlieko, mliekarenské kultúry.
Kakao kohupiimapasta
KOHUPIIM 74%, RÕÕSK KOOR, suhkur, kakaopulber 1,3%, modifitseeritud tärklis, paksendaja (pektiin), hape (sidrunhape).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pilos or Kakao kohupiimapasta?
Overall, Pilos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pilos has fewer calories: 96 kcal versus 130 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pilos has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 12 g per 100 g.