Comparison
Pilos vs Biezpiens 5%
Overall, Pilos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pilos | Biezpiens 5% |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 96 kcal | 125 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 3.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.9 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 18.8 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pilos has 23% fewer calories (96 kcal vs 125 kcal).
- Pilos has 94% less fat (0.3 g vs 5 g).
- Pilos has 94% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 3.1 g).
- Biezpiens 5% has 31% less sugar (2 g vs 2.9 g).
- Only Biezpiens 5% lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Pilos
Odtučnené pasterizované mlieko, mliekarenské kultúry.
Biezpiens 5%
pasterizēts piens, pienskābes baktēriju ieraugs
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pilos or Biezpiens 5%?
Overall, Pilos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pilos has fewer calories: 96 kcal versus 125 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Biezpiens 5% has less sugar: 2 g versus 2.9 g per 100 g.