Philadelphia vs Philadelphia Bieslook
Overall, Philadelphia Bieslook has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Philadelphia | Philadelphia Bieslook |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 64 kcal | 144 kcal |
| Fat | 5.7 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 6.8 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 5.1 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 7.2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Celery, Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Philadelphia has 56% fewer calories (64 kcal vs 144 kcal).
- Philadelphia has 43% less fat (5.7 g vs 10 g).
- Philadelphia has 44% less saturated fat (3.8 g vs 6.8 g).
- Philadelphia has 75% less sugar (1.3 g vs 5.1 g).
- Philadelphia Bieslook has 62% less salt (1 g vs 2.5 g).
- Philadelphia Bieslook has 80% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0.1 g).
- Philadelphia Bieslook has 78% more protein (7.2 g vs 1.6 g).
- Philadelphia Bieslook has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Philadelphia lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Philadelphia
Volle melk, room, melkeiwittenbereiding, weipermeaatconcentraat (van melk), kruiden, ui, knoflook, zout, stabilisator (johannesbroodpitmeel), voedingszuur (citroenzuur), aroma (bevat selderij),
Philadelphia Bieslook
Volle melk, melkeiwittenbereiding, room, weipermeaatconcentraat (van melk), bieslook, zout, stabilisatoren (johannesbroodpitmeel, carrageen), voedingszuur (citroenzuur),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Philadelphia or Philadelphia Bieslook?
Overall, Philadelphia Bieslook has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Philadelphia has fewer calories: 64 kcal versus 144 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Philadelphia has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 5.1 g per 100 g.