Petit Epeautre BIO vs Pommes de terre quartiers des champs (
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Petit Epeautre BIO
Pommes de terre quartiers des champs (
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Petit Epeautre BIO | Pommes de terre quartiers de... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 167 kcal | 65 kcal |
| Fat | 3.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 5.3 g | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 6.4 g | 1.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pommes de terre quartiers des champs ( has 61% fewer calories (65 kcal vs 167 kcal).
- Pommes de terre quartiers des champs ( has 87% less fat (0.5 g vs 3.8 g).
- Petit Epeautre BIO has 44% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Pommes de terre quartiers des champs ( has 65% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Petit Epeautre BIO has 58% more fiber (5.3 g vs 2.2 g).
- Petit Epeautre BIO has 75% more protein (6.4 g vs 1.6 g).
- Only Petit Epeautre BIO lists: Gluten.
- Only Pommes de terre quartiers des champs ( lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Petit Epeautre BIO
Petit épeautre (97%)*, huile de colza*, sel. * issu de l'agriculture biologique.
Pommes de terre quartiers des champs (
Pommes de terre avec peau (91%), eau, sel, antioxydants: acide ascorbique, DISULFITE de sodium
FAQ
Which is healthier: Petit Epeautre BIO or Pommes de terre quartiers des champs (?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pommes de terre quartiers des champs ( has fewer calories: 65 kcal versus 167 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Petit Epeautre BIO has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.