Perle de lait vs Prott
Overall, Prott has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Perle de lait | Prott |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 134 kcal | 62 kcal |
| Fat | 5.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 6.4 g | 3.4 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | — |
| Protein | 4.5 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Prott has 54% fewer calories (62 kcal vs 134 kcal).
- Prott has 91% less fat (0.5 g vs 5.6 g).
- Prott has 87% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 3.8 g).
- Prott has 46% less sugar (3.4 g vs 6.4 g).
- Prott has 55% more protein (10 g vs 4.5 g).
- Prott has the better Nutri-Score.
- Prott is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Perle de lait
Lait écrémé, crème, amidon transformé de riz, poudre de lait écrémé,ferments lactiques (lait),lait d'origine France
Prott
lait* frais écrémé de vache pasteurisé 99,99% (France), ferments lactiques (lait).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Perle de lait or Prott?
Overall, Prott has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Prott has fewer calories: 62 kcal versus 134 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Prott has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 6.4 g per 100 g.