Prott vs LC1 Nature non sucré
Overall, Prott has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Prott | LC1 Nature non sucré |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 62 kcal | 71 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 3.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 3.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Prott has 13% fewer calories (62 kcal vs 71 kcal).
- Prott has 85% less fat (0.5 g vs 3.4 g).
- Prott has 75% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 2 g).
- Prott has 50% more protein (10 g vs 5 g).
- Prott is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Prott
lait* frais écrémé de vache pasteurisé 99,99% (France), ferments lactiques (lait).
LC1 Nature non sucré
Lait entier, lait maigre, protéines de lait, ferments lactiques (dont lactobacillus johnsonii). Sans sucre ajoutés, contient des sucres naturellement présents.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Prott or LC1 Nature non sucré?
Overall, Prott has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Prott has fewer calories: 62 kcal versus 71 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Prott has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.