Prott vs Nature au lait de Brebis
Overall, Prott has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Prott | Nature au lait de Brebis |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 62 kcal | 62 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 3.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 3.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 3.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Prott has 87% less fat (0.5 g vs 3.9 g).
- Prott has 84% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 3.1 g).
- Prott has 64% more protein (10 g vs 3.6 g).
- Prott has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Prott
lait* frais écrémé de vache pasteurisé 99,99% (France), ferments lactiques (lait).
Nature au lait de Brebis
Lait de brebis pasteurisé* 82%, eau, ferments lactiques sélectionnés
FAQ
Which is healthier: Prott or Nature au lait de Brebis?
Overall, Prott has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Prott has fewer calories: 62 kcal versus 62 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nature au lait de Brebis has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.