Comparison

Pavo con trufa y boletus vs Pechuga de pavo al corte

Overall, Pechuga de pavo al corte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPavo con trufa y boletusPechuga de pavo al corte
Nutri-Score d b
NOVA group — 4
Calories 89 kcal 78 kcal
Fat 2.8 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.8 g 0.2 g
Sugars 1.4 g 0.6 g
Salt 2.3 g 2 g
Fiber — 0.1 g
Protein 14.4 g 17.8 g
Additives05
AllergensNone listedSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pechuga de pavo al corte has 12% fewer calories (78 kcal vs 89 kcal).
  • Pechuga de pavo al corte has 82% less fat (0.5 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Pechuga de pavo al corte has 75% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Pechuga de pavo al corte has 57% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Pechuga de pavo al corte has 19% more protein (17.8 g vs 14.4 g).
  • Pechuga de pavo al corte has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Pechuga de pavo al corte lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Pavo con trufa y boletus

Not available.

Pechuga de pavo al corte

turkey breast 70%, water, salt, dextrose, soy protein, stabilizer e451i, stabilizer e407, sugar, antioxidant e301, preservative e250, aromas, spices,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pavo con trufa y boletus or Pechuga de pavo al corte?

Overall, Pechuga de pavo al corte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pechuga de pavo al corte has fewer calories: 78 kcal versus 89 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pechuga de pavo al corte has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons