Pavo con trufa y boletus vs Salchichón de pavo
Overall, Pavo con trufa y boletus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Pavo con trufa y boletus
Salchichón de pavo
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pavo con trufa y boletus | Salchichón de pavo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 89 kcal | 273 kcal |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 6.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 2.3 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 14.4 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 0 | 6 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pavo con trufa y boletus has 67% fewer calories (89 kcal vs 273 kcal).
- Pavo con trufa y boletus has 84% less fat (2.8 g vs 17 g).
- Pavo con trufa y boletus has 87% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 6.3 g).
- Pavo con trufa y boletus has 72% less sugar (1.4 g vs 5 g).
- Pavo con trufa y boletus has 43% less salt (2.3 g vs 4 g).
- Salchichón de pavo has 42% more protein (25 g vs 14.4 g).
- Pavo con trufa y boletus has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Salchichón de pavo lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Pavo con trufa y boletus
Not available.
Salchichón de pavo
Carne de pavo (117 g para obtener 100 g de producto final), grasa de pavo, lactosa, sal, leche desnatada en polvo, dextrosa, especias, estabilizantes (E-450, E-451), proteínas de la leche, aromas, antioxidante (E-301), conservadores (E-250, E-252) y colorante (E-120).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pavo con trufa y boletus or Salchichón de pavo?
Overall, Pavo con trufa y boletus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pavo con trufa y boletus has fewer calories: 89 kcal versus 273 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pavo con trufa y boletus has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 5 g per 100 g.