Comparison

Lomo de Pavo vs Pechuga de pavo al corte

Overall, Pechuga de pavo al corte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLomo de PavoPechuga de pavo al corte
Nutri-Score e b
NOVA group — 4
Calories 172 kcal 78 kcal
Fat 5.8 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 2.8 g 0.2 g
Sugars 0.7 g 0.6 g
Salt 3.8 g 2 g
Fiber — 0.1 g
Protein 40 g 17.8 g
Additives05
AllergensNone listedSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pechuga de pavo al corte has 55% fewer calories (78 kcal vs 172 kcal).
  • Pechuga de pavo al corte has 91% less fat (0.5 g vs 5.8 g).
  • Pechuga de pavo al corte has 93% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Pechuga de pavo al corte has 48% less salt (2 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Lomo de Pavo has 55% more protein (40 g vs 17.8 g).
  • Pechuga de pavo al corte has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Pechuga de pavo al corte lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Lomo de Pavo

Not available.

Pechuga de pavo al corte

turkey breast 70%, water, salt, dextrose, soy protein, stabilizer e451i, stabilizer e407, sugar, antioxidant e301, preservative e250, aromas, spices,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lomo de Pavo or Pechuga de pavo al corte?

Overall, Pechuga de pavo al corte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pechuga de pavo al corte has fewer calories: 78 kcal versus 172 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pechuga de pavo al corte has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons