Pate de oca vs Pato al Oporto
Overall, Pato al Oporto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pate de oca | Pato al Oporto |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 346 kcal | 315 kcal |
| Fat | 35 g | 29.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 11.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 5.5 g | 10.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 7 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, LEITE |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pato al Oporto has 16% less fat (29.5 g vs 35 g).
- Pato al Oporto has 17% less saturated fat (11.6 g vs 14 g).
- Pate de oca has 31% less sugar (0.9 g vs 1.3 g).
- Pato al Oporto has 46% more protein (10.1 g vs 5.5 g).
- Only Pato al Oporto lists: Milk, LEITE.
Ingredients
Pate de oca
Not available.
Pato al Oporto
Fígado de porco (28%). gordura de porco, carne de porco (21%), água, fígado de pato magro (5.4%). tecido conjuntivo de porco, sal, vinho do Porto (1,4%), amido de batata. antioxidantes (E301, E326. E330), emulsificante (E472c), cebola, especiarias e aromas, xarope de glicose, dextrose, tomate. _LEITE_ em po, fibras vegetais, amido de ervilha, espessante (E412), conservantes (E250, E261).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pate de oca or Pato al Oporto?
Overall, Pato al Oporto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pato al Oporto has fewer calories: 315 kcal versus 346 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pate de oca has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.