Comparison
Pate aucanard vs Pate de oca
Overall, Pate aucanard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pate aucanard | Pate de oca |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 298 kcal | 346 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 9 g | 14 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | — |
| Protein | 15 g | 5.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pate aucanard has 14% fewer calories (298 kcal vs 346 kcal).
- Pate aucanard has 29% less fat (25 g vs 35 g).
- Pate aucanard has 36% less saturated fat (9 g vs 14 g).
- Pate aucanard has 18% less salt (1.4 g vs 1.7 g).
- Pate aucanard has 63% more protein (15 g vs 5.5 g).
- Pate aucanard has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pate aucanard
Not available.
Pate de oca
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pate aucanard or Pate de oca?
Overall, Pate aucanard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pate aucanard has fewer calories: 298 kcal versus 346 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pate aucanard has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.