Entenpastete mit Steinpilzen vs Pate de oca
Overall, Entenpastete mit Steinpilzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Entenpastete mit Steinpilzen | Pate de oca |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 321 kcal | 346 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.8 g | 14 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 5.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Entenpastete mit Steinpilzen has 17% less fat (29 g vs 35 g).
- Entenpastete mit Steinpilzen has 37% less saturated fat (8.8 g vs 14 g).
- Entenpastete mit Steinpilzen has 33% less sugar (0.6 g vs 0.9 g).
- Entenpastete mit Steinpilzen has 58% more protein (13 g vs 5.5 g).
- Entenpastete mit Steinpilzen has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Entenpastete mit Steinpilzen
Hühnerleber, Schweinefett, Entenfleisch 15 %, Schweinehals, Separatorenfleisch von Enten 10%, rehydrierte Steinpilze 1,8 %, Salz, Gewürze, Muskatnuss, Pfeffer. Kann Spuren von MILCH, SOJA und SENF enthalten.
Pate de oca
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Entenpastete mit Steinpilzen or Pate de oca?
Overall, Entenpastete mit Steinpilzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Entenpastete mit Steinpilzen has fewer calories: 321 kcal versus 346 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Entenpastete mit Steinpilzen has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.