Entenpastete mit Steinpilzen vs Pate aucanard
Overall, Pate aucanard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Entenpastete mit Steinpilzen | Pate aucanard |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 321 kcal | 298 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.8 g | 9 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pate aucanard has 14% less fat (25 g vs 29 g).
- Pate aucanard has 13% more protein (15 g vs 13 g).
Ingredients
Entenpastete mit Steinpilzen
Hühnerleber, Schweinefett, Entenfleisch 15 %, Schweinehals, Separatorenfleisch von Enten 10%, rehydrierte Steinpilze 1,8 %, Salz, Gewürze, Muskatnuss, Pfeffer. Kann Spuren von MILCH, SOJA und SENF enthalten.
Pate aucanard
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Entenpastete mit Steinpilzen or Pate aucanard?
Overall, Pate aucanard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pate aucanard has fewer calories: 298 kcal versus 321 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Entenpastete mit Steinpilzen has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.