Pate à tartiner framboise fruits secs vs Pistachio Nut Spread
Overall, Pistachio Nut Spread has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pate à tartiner framboise fr... | Pistachio Nut Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 573 kcal | 623 kcal |
| Fat | 45.2 g | 48.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.8 g | 7.1 g |
| Sugars | 9.1 g | 11.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 5.5 g | 8.4 g |
| Protein | 16.5 g | 19.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pate à tartiner framboise fruits secs has 19% less sugar (9.1 g vs 11.2 g).
- Pistachio Nut Spread has 34% more fiber (8.4 g vs 5.5 g).
- Pistachio Nut Spread has 14% more protein (19.1 g vs 16.5 g).
- Only Pate à tartiner framboise fruits secs lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Pate à tartiner framboise fruits secs
noix de cajou 61,1%, noix d’Amazonie, amandes, framboises séchées lyophilisées 5,2%, sucre de coco
Pistachio Nut Spread
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pate à tartiner framboise fruits secs or Pistachio Nut Spread?
Overall, Pistachio Nut Spread has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pate à tartiner framboise fruits secs has fewer calories: 573 kcal versus 623 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pate à tartiner framboise fruits secs has less sugar: 9.1 g versus 11.2 g per 100 g.