Pate à tartiner framboise fruits secs vs Sicilian pistachio butter
Overall, Pate à tartiner framboise fruits secs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Pate à tartiner framboise fruits secs
Sicilian pistachio butter
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pate à tartiner framboise fr... | Sicilian pistachio butter |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 573 kcal | 597 kcal |
| Fat | 45.2 g | 40.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.8 g | 12.4 g |
| Sugars | 9.1 g | 20 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5.5 g | — |
| Protein | 16.5 g | 8.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pate à tartiner framboise fruits secs has 37% less saturated fat (7.8 g vs 12.4 g).
- Pate à tartiner framboise fruits secs has 54% less sugar (9.1 g vs 20 g).
- Pate à tartiner framboise fruits secs has 50% more protein (16.5 g vs 8.2 g).
- Pate à tartiner framboise fruits secs has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pate à tartiner framboise fruits secs lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Pate à tartiner framboise fruits secs
noix de cajou 61,1%, noix d’Amazonie, amandes, framboises séchées lyophilisées 5,2%, sucre de coco
Sicilian pistachio butter
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pate à tartiner framboise fruits secs or Sicilian pistachio butter?
Overall, Pate à tartiner framboise fruits secs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pate à tartiner framboise fruits secs has fewer calories: 573 kcal versus 597 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pate à tartiner framboise fruits secs has less sugar: 9.1 g versus 20 g per 100 g.